By
Strange, isn’t it? A country perched in the North Atlantic with zero soldiers, zero tanks, nothing. The decision wasn’t random. It grew out of history, politics, and a culture that prefers community over combat. This isn’t just defense policy. It’s Iceland choosing its own kind of power.
Why Iceland Has No Military
Iceland doesn’t have a standing army. Since joining NATO in 1949 and signing a defense pact with the United States in 1951, it’s relied on its allies for external defense. At home, the Icelandic Coast Guard and the national police (including the elite Viking Squad) take care of maritime security, air surveillance, and counter-terrorism. And instead of running its own air force, Iceland hosts rotating NATO air-policing missions out of Keflavík.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Iceland in NATO?
Yes. Founding member since 1949.
Does Iceland have an army?
No. No army, air force, or navy.
How is Iceland defended?
NATO, the 1951 US Iceland defense agreement, the Coast Guard, and NATO air policing.
Iceland special forces?
Not military. The Viking Squad is a tactical police unit.
Why Iceland has no army?
Small population and costs, with an alliance-based model in place since 1949 and 1951.
A Brief History of Iceland’s Defense Policy
Iceland broke free from Denmark in 1944 and left something crucial off the to-do list: creating an army. The answer to why Iceland doesn’t have a military starts here. With just over 140,000 people at the time, raising a defense force was neither practical nor affordable.
Instead, the new republic leaned on neutrality and friendly ties to stronger nations. Post-WWII, Iceland’s leaders understood that survival would depend less on battalions and more on agreements.
From the beginning, its security model was built around cooperation abroad rather than militarization at home. That foundation shaped everything that followed.
Cod Wars: When the Coast Guard Defended Iceland’s Waters
During the Cod Wars of 1958–1976, the Icelandic Coast Guard enforced Iceland’s expanding fishing limits by cutting trawler nets, ramming when necessary, and firing warning shots, while British trawlers operated with Royal Navy escorts. These confrontations were intense but calibrated, focused on protecting economic sovereignty rather than waging war. In practice, the Coast Guard functioned as Iceland’s de facto maritime defense, asserting control without a navy or army.
Iceland’s Strategic Location in the North Atlantic
Iceland looks small on the map, but at 103,000 square kilometers (39,768 square miles), it’s a slab of rock parked right between North America and Europe. Just below the Arctic Circle, it became unavoidable in the Cold War.
NATO treated it like a watchtower, guarding the Greenland-Iceland-UK gap where Soviet subs tested the nerves of the West. Does Iceland have an army if its spot is this valuable? Not a chance. The country offered geography, not guns.
Whoever held the skies and seas here controlled the flow of cargo and aircraft across the Atlantic. Fast forward to today, and ice is retreating in the Arctic, Russia flexes, China sniffs around for influence, and Iceland is again the piece no one can move.
NATO Membership and International Defense Agreements
Is Iceland in NATO? Yes, although it has always been unconventional. When it joined in 1949, it became the only founding member without an army. Security came through signed guarantees with larger allies, first and foremost, the United States.
By 1951, Washington agreed to provide protection if Iceland was threatened, a deal that anchored American presence in the North Atlantic. Norway and Denmark also carried responsibility under NATO arrangements, ensuring regional backing.
Iceland’s own contributions leaned on hosting allied facilities, lending diplomatic weight, and sending its Crisis Response Unit to peacekeeping missions.
Legal Basis: NATO 1949 and the 1951 US–Iceland Defense Agreement
Iceland’s no army model rests on two instruments: joining NATO in 1949, which commits the country to collective defense, and the 1951 bilateral defense agreement with the United States. Together they formalize reliance on allies instead of a national military, set terms for external defense support and access to facilities, and enable rotational deployments at Keflavík.
How Air Defense Works Without an Air Force (NATO Air Policing + Radar Network)
Iceland has no air force. Instead, allied fighter detachments rotate through Keflavík to conduct NATO Air Policing, providing quick reaction alert and routine patrols as needed.
On the ground, the Iceland Air Defence System, made up of fixed radars and a national Control and Reporting Center, is operated locally and fully integrated with NATO command and data links.
The Role of the Icelandic Coast Guard
Think of the Coast Guard as Iceland’s army. They heavily rely on ships, helicopters, and a crew that does everything from rescuing stranded sailors to chasing illegal trawlers.
Born in 1926 with the ship Thor and later the cannon-armed Óðinn, the Coast Guard has always punched above its weight. It controls a stretch of ocean 200 nautical miles out, about 370 kilometers, where it runs search and rescue, law enforcement, and defense tasks for NATO. The Joint Rescue Coordination Center is on call around the clock, helicopters launch 120 to 150 missions a year, and the Hydrographic Department charts the sea beneath it all.
Explosive ordnance disposal? They do that too. With over 150 staff, new headquarters in Reykjavík, and fresh assets on the horizon, the ICG keeps scaling up. Their motto says it best: ‘Always Prepared.’ And in Iceland, they actually mean it since their average call-out time is usually about 22 minutes. That’s pretty impressive if you ask us.
U.S. Military Presence and the Keflavik Air Base
The U.S. story in Iceland begins and ends at Keflavík. Marines showed up in 1941, kicked out the Brits, and built an airfield that morphed into NATO’s frontline outpost by 1951. During the Cold War, jets roared off its runways and sub-hunters prowled the North Atlantic.
Iceland and NATO treated it like a hinge between continents. Locals did not always clap. There were protests, anger, accusations of selling sovereignty, but the base stayed. Then in 2006, the Americans packed up, leaving empty hangars and silence. That silence did not last.
Russian bombers, Arctic tensions, and new rivalries brought Keflavík back to life. The hangars reopened, B-2s and F-15s rotated through, P-8A patrol planes scanned the seas, and allies kept showing up for exercises. Keflavík is not the fortress it once was, but it still matters.
Keflavík Today: Rotational Presence, Not a Permanent US Base
The permanent US military presence at Keflavík ended in 2006. The facilities remain Icelandic, supporting the Iceland Air Defence System and hosting allied detachments as needed.
Today, Keflavík serves as a hub for rotations: fighter QRA for NATO Air Policing, maritime patrol aircraft, and joint exercises or training. Personnel come and go on scheduled deployments rather than being stationed there permanently.
How Iceland Ensures National Security Without an Army
Iceland has no traditional army, so security is stitched together differently. NATO allies cover the heavy defense, but daily protection falls to domestic tools. The tactical police unit (Viking Squad), Iceland’s special forces, handles counterterrorism, armed standoffs, and anything too sharp for regular patrols.
Civil defense teams step in during natural disasters, a constant risk on a volcanic island. Abroad, Iceland still shows the flag through peacekeeping, sending trained personnel into missions without combat roles.
This patchwork approach is the Icelandic military substitute: alliances abroad, specialists at home, and a refusal to pour resources into battalions that the country never wanted.
Economic and Social Factors Behind the Absence of a Military
Iceland’s military is absent because the math never added up. With fewer than 400,000 people, raising battalions would drain the workforce. Defense has long taken scraps of the budget, while hospitals, schools, and roads claimed the bulk. This choice shaped a national identity that prizes welfare and diplomacy over uniforms.
Outsourcing defense to NATO and the U.S. freed the government to invest inward, building stability through services instead of soldiers. Today, the extra money marked for security goes to infrastructure and cybersecurity. The army Iceland never built became the schools and hospitals it did.
Public Opinion in Iceland About Having No Armed Forces
Polls show exactly why Iceland does not have a military. Roughly 72 percent of citizens oppose creating one, with only 14 percent in favor and the rest undecided.
This resistance is not just politics. It reflects a national identity built on peace and diplomacy, a tradition Icelanders see as untouchable. Even with rising Arctic tensions and NATO calls for more spending, most people reject the idea of battalions.
Domestic Debate: Protests in 1949 and Today’s Consensus
When Iceland’s parliament voted to join NATO in 1949, thousands protested in Reykjavík, seeing the move as a break with neutrality and a risk of militarization. The clashes outside Alþingi became a defining moment in the country’s postwar politics.
Today, while views on NATO and the U.S. presence still vary, most Icelanders oppose creating a national army. The practical benefits of the alliance model, the cost of maintaining armed forces for a small population, and decades without a military have produced a broad, durable consensus against forming one.
Comparisons with Other Countries Without a Standing Army
Costa Rica scrapped its military in 1949 and redirected funds to schools and hospitals. Liechtenstein dissolved its forces in 1868, leaning on Switzerland for protection. Monaco lives under France’s military umbrella while keeping only a small police corps.
Samoa depends on New Zealand through a treaty, and its police handle daily security. The pattern is clear. These nations trade tanks and battalions for alliances and domestic policing. Iceland stands out for tying its security to NATO and the U.S., while its Coast Guard and Viking Squad fill the roles soldiers might elsewhere.
What Visitors Should Know About Iceland’s Defense Policy
Why does Iceland have no military? Because it never needed one. You will not see tanks or troops, only Coast Guard vessels and police handling what little muscle is required. Tourists often ask if this makes the island less safe. It does not.
We’re a peace-loving nation where security comes through alliances and a culture that values cooperation over combat. What you notice instead is the silence of a land without barracks or bases. Come experience it yourself. Rent a car in Iceland, drive the ring, and see an island that chose peace over armies.
